There needs to be more violence on television.

Yep, I think I've pretty much said it all.
Ok, I shall elaborate:
There needs to be more violence on television, and in particular, Cartoons.
Seriously. Cartoons nowadays are so fucking pussy. I turned to a cartoon today and it was some lameo ardvark feeling guilty because he'd broken his mother's vase or something. Booo. In fact, I have noticed a distinct difference between the cartoons of today and the cartoons of yesteryear. It basically follows a very subtle plotline subtelty that may be unnoticeable to all but the most devoted studiers of literature:

New cartoons: Usually, Character A does something bad involving character B (but not too bad, he just slightly disobeys B or something pussy like that) then he feels guilty/suffers the consequences of it and then he apologises to B, and they all have a big homosexual makeout session while pontiferating on the lesson they've learnt. These lessons are usually a POORLY disguised moral, ie: Never Lie, Don't play with matches, Don't make fun of people, Act Nice To Everyone.
NB: These cartoons are in no way funny or entertaining.

Old Cartoons: Usually, Character A is trying to KILL Character B. Character B is trying to not get killed. It ends with Character A having failed and being seriously injured. No message.
NB: These cartoons are usually fuckin' hilarious

Notice the difference? I know it's subtle and hard to notice for the dipshits who actually waste their time reading this, but IT'S THERE. In fact, let's simplify this even more:

TOM AND JERRY = FUNNY
ARTHUR THE PUSSY DIPSHIT AARDVARK = NOT FUNNY

Am I right? Of course I am, I'm ME. And BAM, this brings me onto the next thing that's pissing me off: Apparently, Warner Bro's have gone back and censored all the violence out of their old cartoons, as well as taking all the speech impediments off Daffy, Elmer, and Porky. The duck, the man, and the pig. Yeah, cos people are insulted by speech impediments. SPEECH IMPEDIMENTS ARE FUNNY. VIOLENCE TO ANIMALS IS FUNNY. Morals about not lying are, to date, not funny. Man, you fucking retards.

I mean, HONESTLY. What's the worst thing that's going to happen if some precious American kiddie watches Jerry beating the livin' shit outta Tom? I bet there are some cunts out there who think that it'll lead to him pickin' up a machine gun and shootin' his way through his school. Screw it, it doesn't matter. As George Carlin said, back in the olden days, that used to happen all the time and they just went on with their sums.
"Twenty four classmates... minus two..."
Hahahhahahhahaa.

Wait, where was I? OH YES. I watched violence in cartoons all the time, and it didn't screw me up. Well, actually, it probably did, but I watched my way through Tom v Jerry, Roadrunner v Coyote and Tweety v Sylvester, I laughed damn hard, and now I'm a sane member of society. Instead, what with all your moral bullshit nowadays, you will end up with a race of pussy children who cry like babies the first time they see a cat getting dynamited.

And ANOTHER THING (woah, this is turning into a full-scale rant). There need to be more references to explicit things in cartoons. I'm thinking drugs, sex, etc. References are funny, as long as they're not totally explicit. And where's the dipshit who said that drug references are bad for kids? I want to stuff your head into a big vat of vinegar until you die to death.

Let's do a role play. Little Jimmy is watching The Magic Roundabout, when he sees the bit with Dougal and the room full of 'sugar' WINK WINK. Here are the two possible outcomes:

a: Jimmy doesn't get the reference. The little moron actually think's its about sugar. NO HARM DONE.
b: Jimmy gets the LSD reference. He already knew about drugs. Therefore, he isn't gonna be warped by something HE ALREADY KNEW ABOUT.

So shut up, already.

Zombie killer: A safe. Dropped from a great height.